Air-gapped independence vs cloud-first convenience. Two different philosophies on where backup data should live.
Veeam-ready, air-gapped, cloud-optional.
Cloud-first appliance with unlimited Barracuda Cloud storage.
Barracuda Backup bundles the appliance with unlimited Barracuda Cloud storage in the subscription. Attractive if cloud is central to your DR plan and if you're comfortable being tied to Barracuda's cloud. StoneFly DR365V wins on air-gapped on-prem immutability (ransomware-independent), flexibility on cloud target, and the ability to operate without a cloud dependency at all. Which matters more depends on whether your RTO tolerance assumes cloud connectivity during a disaster.
Barracuda Backup combines a local appliance with unlimited replication to Barracuda Cloud. The cloud storage is included in the subscription, which makes retention-at-scale predictable, but it also means the product is architecturally dependent on that cloud connection for its full DR story.
| Feature | SFStoneFly DR365V | BCBarracuda Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Primary backup copy location | On-premises immutable storage | On-premises appliance + Barracuda Cloud replica |
| Air-gapped immutability | Built-in air-gapped vault | Cloud-side protection (Barracuda Cloud) |
| Cloud replication target | Any S3-compatible (choice of vendor) | Barracuda Cloud only |
| Cloud storage inclusion | Priced separately (AWS S3, Wasabi, StoneFly Cloud Vault) | Unlimited storage included in subscription |
| Air-gapped vs cloud-only model | Operates fully without cloud connectivity | Cloud dependency for full DR story |
| Backup software | Veeam Backup & Replication | Barracuda proprietary |
| Hypervisor coverage | VMware, Hyper-V, Proxmox, physical | VMware, Hyper-V, physical, limited other |
| Licensing model | Perpetual Veeam + capacity + optional cloud | Subscription bundling appliance + cloud |
| Capacity flexibility | 8-bay to 60-bay, add discs to scale | Fixed models, upgrade-by-replacement |
| Australian data sovereignty | On-prem + Sydney cloud targets | Barracuda Cloud regions |
| Ownership | StoneFly (private, founded 1996) | Barracuda (owned by KKR since 2022) |
| Vendor lock-in risk | Low, portable Veeam catalogue | High, cloud replica only works with Barracuda Cloud |
Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.
Barracuda Backup's pitch is simplicity. One product, one subscription, unlimited cloud storage included. You plug the appliance in, point it at your workloads, and Barracuda Cloud handles the retention and off-site replica. For small sites with simple requirements, it's a clean proposition.
StoneFly DR365V takes the opposite position. Keep the primary backup copy on-premises in an air-gapped vault. Treat cloud as a secondary tier, and pick the cloud target that fits your sovereignty, cost, and retention needs. Cloud replication is optional, not structural to the product.
Both approaches are defensible. The question is how your DR plan handles a bad day. If the bad day is a ransomware event where local systems are compromised but your internet is fine, Barracuda's cloud-side copy is a solid recovery path. If the bad day involves a physical incident that takes out the site *and* the internet (fire, flood, storm, extended outage), an appliance that can boot workloads from a local air-gapped vault without cloud dependency is the more resilient architecture.
The structural difference is where the immutable copy of data lives.
Barracuda Backup places the immutable copy in Barracuda Cloud. Local appliance backups are useful for fast recovery but they are not the ransomware-resistant copy. If ransomware compromises both the production environment and the backup appliance, the cloud replica is the copy that survives. This model works if your internet connection is reliable enough to sustain restore traffic during a recovery event.
DR365V runs a local air-gapped vault that physically disconnects from the backup network between scheduled vault windows. Even if ransomware moves across your entire production and backup network, the vault tier was offline during the compromise and comes online only when the attack is contained. You can recover from the vault without cloud connectivity at all.
For Australian partners serving regional and remote customers, where internet reliability is uneven, the local-vault model is less fragile. For metro customers with well-provisioned cloud connectivity, the difference is smaller.
The 'unlimited cloud storage included' story is the main Barracuda sales angle. It's real, and it's attractive for environments where long-retention obligations would otherwise add a meaningful monthly spend on cloud storage.
The trade-off is that the cloud copy only works with Barracuda Cloud. You cannot point Barracuda Backup at AWS S3, Azure Blob, Wasabi, or your own private S3. If you ever want to move to a different cloud target, the migration is full catalogue rebuild.
DR365V charges for cloud storage separately, which looks more expensive in isolation. In practice, pairing DR365V with Wasabi Sydney or StoneFly Cloud Vault typically lands at AUD 6-8 per TB per month, with no egress fees and full vendor portability. For a customer with 20 TB of long-retention backup, the delta versus the Barracuda subscription cost is often neutral or better on a three-year view. The critical difference is optionality.
Choose Barracuda Backup when:
Choose StoneFly DR365V when:
CRS distributes DR365V, Veeam licensing, and cloud replication targets as a single quote across ANZ and the Pacific. For partners who want the cloud-inclusive simplicity that Barracuda offers but without the vendor tie, we typically pair DR365V with StoneFly Cloud Vault (Wasabi-backed, Sydney-hosted, immutable) or Wasabi Sydney direct. The combined per-TB economics are competitive with Barracuda and you retain full optionality on the cloud tier.
Veeam-native air-gapped appliance vs the Kaseya-owned BCDR incumbent. Where each fits in an Australian MSP stack.
Two integrated BCDR appliances, two ownership models. Where Veeam-on-StoneFly lands against the Kaseya-owned incumbent.
Unified storage platform vs dedicated object storage. When each architecture wins for private S3.
When NetApp's object storage specialist makes sense vs a unified storage platform that also does S3.
Enterprise-grade HCI at a fraction of Nutanix pricing. When each wins for 3-5 node mid-market clusters.
Two HCI appliances, both distributed by CRS. How to decide which fits your customer.
Simple, Affordable Storage Optimisation and Disaster Recovery Protection
Top-Rated Backup, Ransomware Recovery, and Disaster Recovery
15+ SaaS workloads. Independent cloud. More shipping every quarter.