Cloud Ready Solutions
Comparison Guide

Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud for M365 Backup (2026)

Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.

K
Option A
Keepit for Microsoft 365
Keepit

IDC Leader. Pure backup. Merkle tree immutability.

AC
Option B
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Acronis

#1 G2 three years running. Backup + security in one agent.

Quick Summary

This is a philosophical split. Acronis believes backup and security should be a single product. Keepit believes backup should be independent of everything, including your security stack. Acronis gives you malware scanning on restore, EDR integration, and email security in one agent, at USD $4.25/user/month with additional per-GB storage costs. Keepit gives you immutable backup across 16+ SaaS apps from AUD $2.63/user/month with no storage caps. We distribute Keepit because backup that depends on a security platform creates a single point of failure. If your attacker compromises one, they compromise both.

K
Keepit

Keepit for Microsoft 365

Keepit is a pure-SaaS backup platform and IDC MarketScape Leader (2025) for SaaS Data Protection. It backs up 16+ SaaS applications on Keepit-owned infrastructure across 7 regions including Australia. Immutability uses a proprietary Merkle tree architecture. Australian list pricing ranges from AUD $2.63 to $4.47/user/month (Business Essentials tier, depending on seat count and contract term) with unlimited retention and no egress fees.

AC
Acronis

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud bundles backup, anti-malware, EDR, DLP, and email security into a single platform. It has been the #1 rated backup product on G2 for three consecutive years (including Fall 2025) and is used by 21,000+ service providers globally. M365 backup pricing is approximately USD $4.25/user/month. Acronis scans backup data for malware during restore, which adds a security layer that pure backup tools do not offer. Licensing can be complex, with separate tiers for backup, security, and management features.

Head-to-head comparison

Feature
KKeepit for Microsoft 365
ACAcronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Product philosophyPure backup. Independent from security stack.Converged backup + cybersecurity in one platform.
G2 ratingHigh Performer (growing category recognition)#1 rated backup product on G2, three consecutive years
IDC MarketScape positionLeader (2025 IDC MarketScape for SaaS Data Protection)Not evaluated (did not meet standalone SaaS backup criteria)
SaaS apps covered15+ (M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Azure AD, Dynamics, Power Platform)M365, Google Workspace (fewer SaaS-native workloads)
Pricing (M365 backup)from AUD $2.63/user/month, unlimited retention, no egress fees~USD $4.25/user/month + per-GB cloud storage costs
Malware scanning on restoreNo (backup is isolated from security tooling)Yes (scans backup data for malware before restore)
ImmutabilityMerkle tree (structural, cannot be disabled)Acronis Cloud immutable storage (configuration-based)
Infrastructure ownershipKeepit-owned data centres (Equinix), independent of hyperscalersAcronis Cloud + partner-hosted options
AU data centreYes (Sydney, Equinix)Acronis has Australian data centre presence
MSP service providersGrowing MSP programme with multi-tenant portal21,000+ service providers globally
Licensing complexitySimple: per user, per month, all features includedComplex: separate tiers for backup, security, management, workload packs
EDR / email securityNot included (use your preferred security stack)Included in higher tiers (Advanced Security + EDR packs)

Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.

The bundling debate

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is not a backup product. It is a platform that bundles backup, anti-malware, EDR, DLP, email security, and patch management into a single agent. The pitch is compelling: one vendor, one dashboard, one bill.

The problem is that converged platforms create converged failure modes. If an attacker compromises the Acronis agent or gains admin access to the Acronis console, they potentially have access to your backups and your security controls simultaneously. Your backup should be the thing that saves you when everything else fails. If it shares an attack surface with the thing that failed, its value as insurance diminishes.

Keepit takes the opposite approach. It does backup. That is all it does. Your security stack is separate. Your EDR is separate. Your email gateway is separate. If any of those are compromised, the backup sitting on Keepit-owned infrastructure with Merkle tree immutability remains intact because there is no trust relationship between them.

This is not a theoretical concern. Supply-chain attacks on management platforms (SolarWinds, Kaseya VSA) have demonstrated that tools with broad administrative access become high-value targets.

Pricing reality

Acronis M365 backup runs approximately USD $4.25/user/month for the base backup workload. That sounds straightforward until you start adding the pieces MSPs actually need: Advanced Backup pack, Advanced Security pack, Advanced Email Security, Advanced DLP. Each pack adds per-workload, per-GB, or per-user charges.

The cloud storage model adds another variable. Acronis cloud storage is priced per GB. For organisations with large mailboxes, extensive SharePoint libraries, or long retention requirements, the storage cost can exceed the per-user licence cost.

Keepit's Australian list price for Business Essentials starts from AUD $2.63/user/month (5,001+ seats, 5-year term) up to AUD $4.47 (under 100 seats, 1-year term). Unlimited retention. No egress fees. No per-GB storage charges. No additional packs to unlock features. The entire backup platform is included in the base price.

Note that Acronis prices in USD while Keepit bills in AUD — removing currency conversion risk for Australian organisations. Even at the top of Keepit's range (AUD $4.47), the all-inclusive price sits below Acronis once storage and add-on packs are factored in. After storage, the gap widens. For MSPs managing thousands of seats across multiple tenants, the pricing delta is significant.

Acronis does offer more functionality for that higher price. If you genuinely use the EDR, email security, and DLP features, the converged pricing may represent value. If you only need backup, you are paying for security capabilities you are not using.

G2 versus IDC: different lenses on the same market

Acronis has been the #1 rated product on G2 in the backup category for three consecutive years, including Fall 2025. That is a genuine achievement and reflects real user satisfaction, particularly among MSPs who value the single-pane-of-glass approach.

Keepit was named a Leader in the 2025 IDC MarketScape for SaaS Data Protection. The IDC evaluation uses different criteria: it requires vendors to cover 5+ SaaS applications with 80%+ proprietary IP as a standalone product. Acronis was not evaluated because it did not meet the standalone SaaS backup criteria.

These are different evaluations measuring different things. G2 reflects aggregate user ratings across all backup use cases. IDC MarketScape evaluates SaaS-specific backup depth, independence, and infrastructure ownership. An MSP could reasonably value both signals.

What the IDC Leader status tells you about Keepit is that its SaaS backup capabilities were evaluated against the strictest criteria in the category and it came out on top. What G2's #1 ranking tells you about Acronis is that the broadest base of users rates their overall experience highly.

SaaS coverage and the specialisation advantage

Keepit covers 16+ SaaS applications natively: Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Azure Active Directory, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Zendesk, and more. Each connector is purpose-built with application-aware backup and granular restore.

Acronis covers Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace for SaaS backup. It also backs up endpoints, servers, and VMs, which Keepit does not. But for SaaS-specific coverage, Keepit is broader.

This matters for MSPs whose customers use Salesforce, run business processes in Power Automate, or manage identity through Azure AD. Identity backup is increasingly important: Keepit's 2026 Data Insight Report found that identity systems are tested 4x less frequently than productivity systems during disaster recovery exercises, yet identity is the first thing you need to restore after a breach.

Acronis will argue that covering endpoints, servers, and SaaS from one platform is more convenient. That is true. Keepit will argue that SaaS backup done by a SaaS-specialised platform is done better. Both positions have merit. The question is whether you value breadth across infrastructure types or depth across SaaS applications.

Our recommendation

Choose Acronis if you want a single platform that handles backup, security, and endpoint protection together, and you are willing to pay the premium and manage the licensing complexity. Acronis is a good product with a large, satisfied user base. Its G2 ratings are earned.

Choose Keepit if you want your backup isolated from your security stack, you need coverage beyond M365 and Google Workspace, and predictable pricing matters. We distribute Keepit because we believe backup is insurance, and insurance should not share an attack surface with the assets it protects.

For MSPs who already run a separate EDR (SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Huntress) and a separate email gateway (Proofpoint, Mimecast), adding Acronis means paying for security capabilities that duplicate what you already have. Keepit lets you keep your existing security investments and add SaaS backup without overlap.

See also: Keepit vs Druva | Keepit vs Microsoft Native

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud has been the highest-rated product in the G2 backup category for three consecutive reporting periods through Fall 2025. This reflects real user reviews, not a vendor claim. The rating covers the full Acronis platform, not just SaaS backup.

Evaluating pure SaaS backup for your M365 environment?

CRS distributes Keepit across Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific. We will run a pricing comparison against your current Acronis licensing and show you the per-workload economics. If Acronis is the better fit for your stack, we will tell you that.

Related comparisons

K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
AP

Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup for Australian Organisations (2026)

AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.

Read comparison
K
vs
D

Keepit vs Datto SaaS Protection for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.

Read comparison
K
vs
DR

Keepit vs Druva for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.

Read comparison
K
vs
MS

Keepit vs Microsoft 365 Native Backup: Do You Need Third-Party? (2026)

Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.

Read comparison
K
vs
SK

Keepit vs SkyKick Cloud Backup for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.

Read comparison
N
vs
AC

NAKIVO vs Acronis Cyber Protect: VM Backup Depth vs Security Bundle (2026)

Pure VM backup specialist vs a backup+security+endpoint bundle. When the integration helps, when it hurts.

Read comparison
K
vs
AS

Keepit vs Arcserve SaaS Backup: The OEM Relationship You Should Know About (2026)

Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.

Read comparison
K
vs
BC

Keepit vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup: M365 Backup Compared (2026)

Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Jira Cloud Backup (2026)

Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Confluence Cloud Backup (2026)

Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for GitHub Backup (2026)

Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for Azure DevOps Backup (2026)

Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acsense for Okta Backup (2026)

A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.

Read comparison
K
vs
ZD

Keepit vs Zendesk Native Backup: Why Zendesk Exports Are Not Enough (2026)

Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.

Read comparison