Cloud Ready Solutions
Comparison Guide

Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup for Australian Organisations (2026)

AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.

K
Option A
Keepit
Keepit

IDC Leader. 16+ SaaS workloads. Independent infrastructure.

AP
Option B
AvePoint Cloud Backup
AvePoint

IRAP-certified. Governance-first. BYOC storage flexibility.

Quick Summary

This comparison is closer than the others on this page. Both products cover M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, and Entra ID. AvePoint wins on two fronts: IRAP certification (which Keepit does not have, full stop) and Microsoft governance tooling (data classification, sensitivity labels, tenant migration). Keepit wins on workload breadth (17+ vs 6), pricing transparency (from AUD $2.63/user/month all-inclusive vs AvePoint's opaque tiering plus storage costs), infrastructure independence, and structural immutability. If you are selling to Australian Government, AvePoint's IRAP is a hard barrier Keepit cannot clear. For everything else, we believe Keepit offers a simpler, more predictable, and broader product. G2 reviewers praise AvePoint's governance features but flag opaque pricing and slow support response.

K
Keepit

Keepit

Keepit is a pure SaaS backup platform and one of two Leaders in the 2025 IDC MarketScape for SaaS Data Protection. It protects 16+ SaaS applications as of May 2026 on Keepit-owned infrastructure (Equinix, 7 regions including Sydney). Immutability uses a proprietary Merkle tree architecture. Australian list pricing ranges from AUD $2.63 to $4.47/user/month (Business Essentials tier, depending on seat count and contract term) with unlimited retention, no egress fees, and free offboarding. Keepit does not hold IRAP certification.

AP
AvePoint

AvePoint Cloud Backup

AvePoint is a NASDAQ-listed data management company with deep Microsoft roots. Cloud Backup covers M365, Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Google Workspace, and Salesforce (6 workloads). AvePoint also sells migration, governance, and compliance tools. It holds IRAP certification (critical for Australian Government contracts), G2 Grid Leader and Momentum Leader status (Summer 2025), and offers BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) storage on Azure, AWS, or GCP. Pricing starts from ~USD 2/user/month but storage, API costs, and overages are separate.

Head-to-head comparison

Feature
KKeepit
APAvePoint Cloud Backup
SaaS workloads covered15+ as of May 2026 (M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, GitHub, Jira, Confluence, Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Azure DevOps, Zendesk, Okta, DocuSign, BambooHR, Miro). More added regularly.6 (M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform).
IRAP certificationNo.Yes. Required for Australian Government contracts.
Pricing (per user/month)from AUD $2.63/user/month. Unlimited retention, no egress, no storage overage.From ~USD 2/user. Storage extra (managed or BYOC). Hidden API costs reported by multiple reviewers.
Backup infrastructureKeepit-owned data centres (Equinix). No hyperscaler dependency.BYOC (Azure, AWS, GCP) or AvePoint-managed. Most AU deployments land on Azure.
ImmutabilityMerkle tree (structural). Cannot be disabled or misconfigured.Depends on BYOC storage configuration (S3 Object Lock, Azure immutable blobs).
M365 coverage depthExchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams.Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, Groups, Planner, Project Online, private channels.
Governance and compliance toolsBackup and restore only.Data classification, sensitivity labelling, DLP, retention policies, audit trails, tenant migration.
DevOps and collaboration workloadsGitHub, Jira, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Miro.None.
Setup complexityMinimal. Policy-based, out-of-the-box configuration.Complex. RBAC, policies, retention rules require skilled administration.
Contract flexibilityMonth-to-month or annual. No long-term commitment required.Annual or multi-year contracts only. No month-to-month option.
Support qualityMSP-focused. G2 reviews praise responsiveness.Enterprise-focused. Multiple G2 reviews cite slow response times.
Cross-tenant restoreSupported.Supported. Strong multi-tenant capabilities via Elements Portal.
Australian data residencyKeepit Sydney DC (Equinix).Azure Australia East/Southeast or BYOC in an AU region.
Analyst recognition2025 IDC MarketScape Leader. 3.4% mindshare.G2 Grid Leader and Momentum Leader (Summer 2025). Strong AU Government presence.

Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.

Why this comparison is different

Most of the comparisons on this page are lopsided on workload count. This one is closer. AvePoint covers 6 SaaS applications, including the same Microsoft ecosystem workloads (Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform) that most Veeam products miss. Both cover Google Workspace. Both cover Salesforce.

The real differentiators are not the backup features themselves but the things around them: AvePoint's IRAP certification and governance tooling versus Keepit's workload breadth, pricing transparency, and infrastructure independence. Your buying decision likely comes down to which of those factors matters most to your organisation.

The IRAP question

AvePoint holds IRAP (Information Security Registered Assessors Program) certification. Keepit does not. For Australian Government contracts, this is a hard barrier. If you are selling to federal agencies, state government departments, or any organisation that mandates IRAP-assessed products, AvePoint wins this comparison before the feature table matters.

We are direct about this because there is no workaround. Keepit's Australian data centre, ISO 27001 certification, and SOC 2 Type II compliance meet the requirements for most private sector organisations. But they do not substitute for IRAP in a procurement process that specifically requires it.

For state and local government, healthcare, and financial services organisations where IRAP is recommended but not mandated, the picture is different. Both products satisfy the data sovereignty and compliance posture that auditors typically look for. In those cases, the comparison shifts back to features, pricing, and architecture.

Pricing: transparency versus hidden costs

This is where we have the strongest opinion. AvePoint's pricing is opaque. Multiple G2 reviewers and customer case studies report difficulty getting clear pricing before a sales engagement, surprise API costs after signup, and storage overage charges that were not obvious at contract signing. The starting price of ~USD 2/user/month is real, but it is the starting price. Storage, API usage, and overages are separate and vary by configuration.

Keepit's Australian list price for Business Essentials ranges from AUD $2.63 to $4.47/user/month depending on seat count and contract term. Unlimited retention, unlimited storage, no egress fees, and free offboarding if you leave. The total cost is the quoted cost. No surprises at renewal.

AvePoint also requires annual or multi-year contracts with no month-to-month option. Keepit offers monthly billing for partners who need flexibility.

For MSPs building a resale practice, pricing predictability directly affects margin confidence. If you cannot reliably predict your cost base, you either over-provision (eating margin) or under-quote (eating the overage). Keepit's model eliminates that uncertainty.

Where AvePoint wins

AvePoint is the better choice in several specific scenarios:

  • Australian Government contracts requiring IRAP-assessed products. Non-negotiable.
  • Microsoft-only governance environments where you want backup, data classification, sensitivity labelling, DLP, and tenant migration from one vendor. AvePoint's governance tooling is mature and genuinely useful for large M365 compliance programmes.
  • Planner and Project Online backup, which AvePoint covers and Keepit does not.
  • Mid-merger organisations that need tenant-to-tenant M365 migration alongside backup. AvePoint sells migration tools from the same vendor.
  • BYOC flexibility for organisations that want to control their storage infrastructure. AvePoint supports Azure, AWS, and GCP as storage targets. Keepit requires use of its own cloud (no bring-your-own-storage option).

AvePoint's Elements Portal for multi-tenant MSP management is also well regarded, though Keepit's Partner Management Console covers similar ground.

Where Keepit wins

Keepit is the stronger choice when:

  • You protect more than Microsoft and Salesforce. Keepit's 16+ workloads (as of May 2026) cover GitHub, Jira, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Zendesk, Okta, DocuSign, BambooHR, and Miro. AvePoint covers none of these.
  • Infrastructure independence matters. Keepit's backup has no relationship with Azure, AWS, or GCP. AvePoint deployments, in practice, usually land on Azure.
  • Immutability must be structural. Keepit's Merkle tree architecture is immutable by design. AvePoint's immutability depends on how the underlying BYOC storage is configured.
  • Pricing predictability matters. Keepit's all-inclusive per-user price eliminates storage overages, API surprises, and overage charges. AvePoint customers have been burned by these.
  • You need contract flexibility. Month-to-month billing versus annual-minimum lock-in.
  • You are an MSP building a growing SaaS backup offering. Every new Keepit connector is a new billable service with zero deployment overhead.

Keepit also ships new connectors faster than AvePoint, with a target of 100+ workloads by 2028. That pace of expansion matters for MSPs who want a product that grows their addressable market over time.

See also: Keepit vs Datto | Keepit vs Acronis

Frequently asked questions

Yes. AvePoint holds IRAP certification, which is required for Australian Government and regulated-sector procurement. Keepit does not hold IRAP. If IRAP is a hard requirement in your procurement process, AvePoint wins this comparison regardless of other factors.

Comparing Keepit and AvePoint for your organisation?

CRS distributes Keepit across Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific. We will map both products against your SaaS footprint and compliance requirements. If AvePoint is the right answer for your environment (particularly in Government procurement), we will say so directly.

Related comparisons

K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
D

Keepit vs Datto SaaS Protection for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud for M365 Backup (2026)

Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.

Read comparison
K
vs
DR

Keepit vs Druva for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.

Read comparison
K
vs
MS

Keepit vs Microsoft 365 Native Backup: Do You Need Third-Party? (2026)

Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.

Read comparison
K
vs
SK

Keepit vs SkyKick Cloud Backup for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
AS

Keepit vs Arcserve SaaS Backup: The OEM Relationship You Should Know About (2026)

Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.

Read comparison
K
vs
BC

Keepit vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup: M365 Backup Compared (2026)

Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Jira Cloud Backup (2026)

Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Confluence Cloud Backup (2026)

Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for GitHub Backup (2026)

Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for Azure DevOps Backup (2026)

Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acsense for Okta Backup (2026)

A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.

Read comparison
K
vs
ZD

Keepit vs Zendesk Native Backup: Why Zendesk Exports Are Not Enough (2026)

Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.

Read comparison