Cloud Ready Solutions
Comparison Guide

Keepit vs Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.

K
Option A
Keepit
Keepit

IDC Leader. 16+ SaaS workloads. Independent cloud.

V
Option B
Veeam Data Cloud
Veeam

Veeam's managed SaaS backup, USD $2.63-$7/user, built on Azure.

Quick Summary

This is a SaaS-vs-SaaS comparison. Both are fully managed. We distribute Keepit because of two structural advantages: Keepit's backup sits on independent infrastructure completely outside Azure, and Keepit covers 16+ SaaS workloads where VDC covers 4. If M365 is the only thing you need to protect and you are already a Veeam shop, VDC Foundation at USD 2.63/user/month is hard to argue with. If you need Google Workspace, Jira, GitHub, Dynamics 365, or any of the 10+ other apps Keepit covers, VDC cannot do the job at any price. The Azure independence question is separate and often the deciding factor for compliance-driven Australian buyers.

K
Keepit

Keepit

Keepit is a pure SaaS backup platform and one of two Leaders in the 2025 IDC MarketScape for SaaS Data Protection. It protects 16+ SaaS applications as of May 2026, with new connectors shipping every 4-6 weeks via a proprietary DSL framework. Storage uses Merkle tree (blockchain-inspired) immutability on Keepit-owned infrastructure in Equinix data centres across 7 regions including Sydney. Pricing is per user with unlimited retention, no egress fees, and free offboarding. Market mindshare sits at 3.4% (below Veeam) but recognition is growing in the compliance-first segment.

V
Veeam

Veeam Data Cloud

Veeam Data Cloud (VDC) is Veeam's fully managed SaaS backup product, launched in 2024. Unlike the older self-managed VB365, Veeam runs the infrastructure and you get a web portal. VDC covers M365, Entra ID, Salesforce, and Azure IaaS/PaaS. Backups land in Azure Blob Storage in your chosen region. Foundation tier starts at USD 2.63/user/month; Premium runs USD 5-7 with faster restores via Microsoft Backup Storage APIs. Veeam protects 25M+ M365 users globally and holds Microsoft preferred platinum partner status, but its market mindshare has dropped from 17.8% to 14.3% year-over-year.

Head-to-head comparison

Feature
KKeepit
VVeeam Data Cloud
Delivery modelPure SaaS, vendor-managedPure SaaS, vendor-managed
Backup infrastructureKeepit-owned data centres (Equinix). No hyperscaler dependency.Azure Blob Storage in customer-selected Azure region.
Independent of Microsoft/AzureFully. Separate cloud, separate vendor, separate billing.No. Backups stored in Azure, the same platform running M365.
SaaS workloads covered15+ as of May 2026 (M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, GitHub, Jira, Confluence, Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Azure DevOps, Zendesk, Okta, DocuSign, BambooHR, Miro). More added regularly.4 (M365, Entra ID, Salesforce, Azure IaaS/PaaS).
Pricing (per user/month)from AUD $2.63/user/month. All-inclusive: unlimited retention, storage, no egress.Foundation: USD 2.63. Advanced: ~USD 3.33. Premium: USD 5-7. Fair Use storage limits apply.
ImmutabilityMerkle tree (structural). Cannot be disabled or misconfigured.Azure Blob immutability policies. Configuration-based.
Restore speedOptimised for per-item restore (90% of real-world recovery is single-file). Adequate for bulk.Premium tier: 5+ TB/hour via Microsoft Backup Storage APIs. Industry-leading for bulk recovery.
eDiscoveryFunctional search and export. Improving with regular platform updates.Enterprise-grade. Legal hold, content search, bulk export.
Azure IaaS/PaaS backupNo. SaaS workloads only.Yes. Azure VMs, Azure SQL, Cosmos DB.
Google WorkspaceYes. Gmail, Drive, Shared Drives, Calendar, Contacts.No.
DevOps (GitHub, Jira, Confluence)Yes. GitHub, Azure DevOps, Jira, Confluence all included.No.
Australian data residencyKeepit Sydney DC (Equinix-hosted).Azure Australia East.
Analyst recognition2025 IDC MarketScape Leader (one of two). 3.4% mindshare.Microsoft preferred platinum partner. 14.3% mindshare (declining from 17.8%).
Veeam B&R integrationNone. Standalone platform.Native. Same management as Veeam Backup & Replication.

Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.

This is not the old comparison

If you came here looking for the self-managed Veeam product versus a SaaS platform, we have a separate comparison of Keepit versus Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 (VB365) that covers that.

Veeam Data Cloud launched in 2024 as Veeam's managed SaaS answer. It removes the biggest operational argument against Veeam: you no longer provision servers, size storage, or patch anything. Veeam runs the infrastructure, you get a web portal.

That changes the comparison. The 'no infrastructure to manage' advantage Keepit used to hold over Veeam disappears when you compare against VDC. What remains are two questions: where does the backup data physically live, and how many of your SaaS applications does the product actually cover?

The Azure dependency question

VDC stores backups in Azure Blob Storage. You pick an Azure region (Australia East is available) and your backup data lands there. Veeam is transparent about this.

The problem: if you are backing up Microsoft 365 because you are worried about a Microsoft-related incident, storing those backups inside Microsoft infrastructure creates a logical dependency. VDC is supposed to be the 'fully managed, worry about nothing' product, which makes the Azure dependency easier to overlook.

Three scenarios where it matters:

1. Tenant compromise. An attacker who has gained Global Admin may be able to reach Azure resources in the same directory. Your VDC backups are in Azure. Your Keepit backups are not. 2. Azure regional outage. If the Azure region goes down, your M365 data and your backup of that data are both affected. VDC offers cross-region replication, but the replicas are still Azure. 3. Commercial dispute. If Microsoft suspends your Azure subscription, you want backup data accessible through a different vendor. Keepit's billing and infrastructure are entirely separate.

Australian organisations subject to APRA CPS 234 or Essential Eight maturity assessments are already being asked by auditors to explain whether their backup shares a failure domain with production. Keepit makes that answer simple.

16+ workloads versus 4

This is where the comparison gets lopsided. VDC covers 4 workloads: M365, Entra ID, Salesforce, and Azure IaaS/PaaS. Fine if your world is Microsoft and Salesforce.

Keepit covers 16+ workloads as of May 2026, and the number grows every quarter. The full list: M365, Entra ID, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Azure DevOps, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, Confluence, Zendesk, Okta, DocuSign, BambooHR, Miro, GitHub, and Monday.com. Keepit's DSL framework lets them build new connectors faster than traditional development. Their published roadmap includes GitLab, ServiceNow, HubSpot, Workday, Figma, and Notion, targeting 100+ connectors by 2028.

For MSPs, this is a revenue question. Every new Keepit connector is a new service you can bill without deploying a second product. You manage M365 backup through Keepit's Partner Management Console. When Keepit ships the Monday.com connector, you flip a switch in the same portal and start billing. With VDC, there is no path to backing up Jira, or GitHub. You need a second vendor.

For end users, adopting a new SaaS application is less risky when your existing backup platform already covers it. An IT team evaluating Jira knows Keepit protects it from day one. With VDC, each new SaaS adoption outside the Microsoft/Salesforce ecosystem reopens the backup question.

Where VDC wins

Credit where it is due. VDC is the better product in several specific scenarios.

Keepit does not back up Azure IaaS or PaaS. If you run VMs in Azure, Azure SQL databases, or Cosmos DB, VDC covers those and Keepit does not. Having one product for both SaaS tenants and Azure infrastructure is genuinely useful for Azure-heavy organisations.

VDC Premium tier includes integration with Microsoft 365 Backup Storage, which uses Microsoft's own backup APIs for restore speeds above 5 TB per hour. For very large tenants with tens of terabytes of SharePoint data, this meaningfully reduces recovery time. Keepit's restore is optimised for per-item recovery (which accounts for 90% of real-world restores per Keepit's 2026 Data Insight Report), but VDC Premium has the edge on large-scale bulk recovery.

Veeam's eDiscovery is the strongest in the category. If your organisation runs regular litigation holds or content searches across thousands of mailboxes, this is a genuine advantage that Keepit does not match today.

The Veeam ecosystem matters too. MSPs already in the VCSP programme can add VDC to existing rental billing without onboarding a new vendor. IT teams running Veeam B&R for on-premises workloads get a unified management plane.

Pricing: the numbers

Both products charge per user per month. The structures differ.

VDC has three tiers. Foundation (M365 backup only) starts at USD 2.63/user/month. Advanced adds Entra ID at USD 3.33. Premium adds Microsoft Backup Storage integration for faster restores at USD 5-7. Veeam advertises 'unlimited' storage, but the Fair Use policy means excessive restores or queries may trigger throttling. Real-world MSP costs reported by MSP360 run USD 4.10+/user/month, higher than list price due to bundling and SLA tiers.

Keepit publishes AUD pricing for the Australian market. Business Essentials (the base tier covering M365, Salesforce, GWS, and 11 other SaaS apps) ranges from AUD $2.63 to $4.47/user/month depending on seat count and contract length. All 16+ workloads are accessible at every plan. Enterprise Unlimited and Governance Plus plans include genuinely unlimited retention with no fair-use caveats. No egress fees. Free offboarding if you leave.

Here is where the comparison shifts. For M365-only protection, VDC Foundation is likely cheaper per user. But if you also need Google Workspace, Jira, GitHub, Dynamics 365, or any of the other SaaS apps Keepit covers, VDC cannot do the job at any price. You need VDC plus a second product, and the combined cost almost certainly exceeds Keepit alone.

For MSPs, Keepit's flat per-user rate across all workloads simplifies the rate card. VDC's tiered pricing means more SKU management and cost variability as customers move between tiers.

Our recommendation

We distribute Keepit and we are upfront about that. Here is our honest assessment.

Choose Keepit when:

  • Independence from Azure is a compliance or risk requirement.
  • You protect SaaS apps beyond M365 and Salesforce.
  • You are an MSP building a growing SaaS backup practice.
  • Structural immutability matters for your auditors.
  • You want one vendor for all SaaS backup with a predictable, all-inclusive cost.

Choose Veeam Data Cloud when:

  • You need Azure IaaS/PaaS backup alongside M365.
  • You already run Veeam B&R and want one management plane.
  • Restore speed for very large SharePoint tenants is a priority.
  • You are an existing VCSP partner and adding VDC keeps your vendor count at one.
  • Your scope is strictly Microsoft, Salesforce, and Azure with no plans to expand.
  • eDiscovery and legal hold are core requirements (Veeam's is stronger).

If your organisation sits on the fence, CRS can run a workload-by-workload cost comparison. We distribute Keepit but we will tell you if VDC is the better fit for part of your estate.

See also: Keepit vs Veeam for M365 | Keepit vs Druva

Frequently asked questions

No. Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 (VB365) is self-managed software you install on a Windows server. Veeam Data Cloud (VDC) is a fully managed SaaS product where Veeam runs the infrastructure. VB365 gives you more control; VDC eliminates operational overhead. Both back up M365 but with different licensing and architecture.

Choosing between Keepit and Veeam Data Cloud?

CRS distributes Keepit across Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific. We will run a workload-by-workload cost comparison against your SaaS footprint and compliance requirements. If VDC is the right answer for part of your estate, we will tell you.

Related comparisons

N
vs
V

NAKIVO vs Veeam for Australian MSPs (2026)

Licensing, multi-tenancy, pricing, and deployment decisions for MSPs building a backup-as-a-service practice in Australia.

Read comparison
K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
AP

Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup for Australian Organisations (2026)

AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.

Read comparison
K
vs
D

Keepit vs Datto SaaS Protection for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud for M365 Backup (2026)

Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.

Read comparison
K
vs
DR

Keepit vs Druva for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.

Read comparison
K
vs
MS

Keepit vs Microsoft 365 Native Backup: Do You Need Third-Party? (2026)

Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.

Read comparison
K
vs
SK

Keepit vs SkyKick Cloud Backup for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
AS

Keepit vs Arcserve SaaS Backup: The OEM Relationship You Should Know About (2026)

Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.

Read comparison
N
vs
V

NAKIVO vs Veeam for Australian Businesses (2026)

Licensing, coverage, and cost for Australian businesses choosing a backup platform for internal IT, not an MSP practice.

Read comparison
K
vs
BC

Keepit vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup: M365 Backup Compared (2026)

Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Jira Cloud Backup (2026)

Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Confluence Cloud Backup (2026)

Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for GitHub Backup (2026)

Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for Azure DevOps Backup (2026)

Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acsense for Okta Backup (2026)

A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.

Read comparison
K
vs
ZD

Keepit vs Zendesk Native Backup: Why Zendesk Exports Are Not Enough (2026)

Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.

Read comparison