Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.
The source platform. Full API, full channel, full AU support.
A Keepit OEM, rebranded and feature-limited.
This is an unusual comparison because Arcserve SaaS Backup is literally an OEM of the Keepit platform, same underlying technology, Arcserve-branded, feature-limited, and without a public API. For MSPs the lack of API is the deciding issue: managing hundreds of tenants programmatically isn't possible without one. Add the channel conflict (Arcserve sells direct via buy.arcserve.com competing with partners) and the absence of any Arcserve technical team in Australia — where Keepit has its own in-country technical pre-sales plus CRS engineering behind it — and Keepit is the right answer for any partner serious about SaaS backup as a service. The OEM relationship means you're buying a rebranded, feature-behind version of the same platform you could get direct.
Arcserve SaaS Backup is an OEM of the Keepit platform, rebranded under the Arcserve name with a reduced feature set, no public API, and direct-sales via buy.arcserve.com in addition to channel. No technical team in Australia.
| Feature | KKeepit | ASArcserve SaaS Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying technology | Keepit platform (source) | Keepit OEM (rebranded) |
| M365 workloads (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams) | Full coverage | Full coverage |
| Entra ID / Azure AD backup | Yes | Yes (via OEM) |
| Google Workspace backup | Yes | Yes |
| Salesforce backup | Yes | Yes |
| Dynamics 365 backup | Yes | Yes |
| Power Platform backup | Yes (Keepit is first to market with new workloads) | Lags Keepit (OEM updates delayed) |
| REST API for MSP automation | Yes, full API | No public API |
| Channel model | 100% channel | Direct (buy.arcserve.com) + channel |
| Direct-to-customer sales | Never | Yes (competes with own partners) |
| Independent blockchain-verified cloud | Yes | Yes (via Keepit infrastructure) |
| AU data residency | Yes (Sydney via Equinix) | Yes (via Keepit Sydney infrastructure) |
| AU technical presence | In-country Keepit technical pre-sales + CRS engineering in AU | No technical team in AU |
| Subscription terms | 1-5 year terms | 1-3 year terms |
| PeerSpot ranking | #16 | #19 |
Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.
Arcserve SaaS Backup is built on Keepit. This is not a feature overlap or a similar architecture, Arcserve licenses Keepit's platform, brands the UI with Arcserve colours, and resells it as their own product. The underlying infrastructure, the backup engine, the storage, and the recovery tooling are all Keepit's.
This relationship is not hidden, but it's also not prominent in Arcserve's marketing. Partners selling Arcserve SaaS Backup may not realise they're selling a rebranded version of a product they could get directly from the source vendor with better terms and deeper feature access.
CRS distributes Keepit because the direct relationship gives partners the full product, first access to new workloads, full API capabilities, and local AU technical support. Arcserve SaaS Backup takes the same core platform and subtracts capabilities on the way to partners.
This is the single most important functional difference. Keepit provides a full REST API that MSPs use to programmatically manage tenants, configure backup policies, trigger restores, pull reporting, and integrate with PSA/RMM tools. For MSPs managing backup across hundreds of customer tenants, API access is non-negotiable.
Arcserve SaaS Backup does not provide a public API. MSP operations that are automated via Keepit's API have to be done manually through the Arcserve SaaS Backup UI. For a practice managing 20-50 customers, this is manageable. For a practice managing 100+ customers, it's operationally unsustainable.
Pretending this doesn't matter would be dishonest to partners. The API is how modern MSPs operate backup at scale. Its absence from Arcserve SaaS Backup is a deciding factor for any partner serious about the category.
Keepit is 100% channel-focused. Keepit does not sell direct to end customers. Partners who sell Keepit don't compete with Keepit for their own customers.
Arcserve sells SaaS Backup directly via buy.arcserve.com in addition to channel. If a partner has a prospect who Googles 'Arcserve SaaS Backup', the Arcserve website is often the top result with a direct 'buy now' button. The partner's sale is at risk of being short-circuited by the vendor itself.
For MSPs building long-term customer relationships around backup-as-a-service, vendor channel integrity is a business-model decision, not a preference. Vendors who compete with their own channel produce tension that eventually damages partner margins. Keepit's strict channel model is a structural advantage, not a marketing claim.
Keepit has a real in-country footprint in Australia. There's a Keepit technical pre-sales resource on the ground here, plus CRS engineering as the distributor providing deployment, escalation, and day-two support. Partners working on a Keepit opportunity can pull in either Keepit's own AU technical team for vendor-direct engagement or the CRS engineers as the distribution-layer expertise — often both on the same deal. AU business hours, AUD billing, and direct escalation to Keepit headquarters are all covered.
Arcserve does not have a technical team in Australia. Partners selling Arcserve SaaS Backup escalate to offshore support, typically US or EU hours, and rely on the OEM-Keepit infrastructure underneath without the direct relationship. For customers with operational issues during AU hours, this is a real gap.
For partners considering Arcserve SaaS Backup vs Keepit specifically for AU customers, the presence gap usually decides the conversation. Keepit in-country plus CRS engineering is structurally what partners need when customers have issues.
When Keepit releases new workload coverage (a new M365 workload, a new Google Workspace feature, or a new SaaS platform like Power Platform), Keepit partners get it immediately. Arcserve SaaS Backup customers get it after Arcserve updates its OEM integration, which historically lags by weeks to months.
For MSPs whose customers expect current coverage of new workloads, the feature-lag is a real disadvantage. Keepit was first to market with Entra ID backup, first with Power Platform, and consistently first with new M365 workloads. Arcserve follows on a delay.
Subscription terms also differ. Keepit offers 1-5 year terms, giving flexibility to match customer commitments. Arcserve SaaS Backup offers 1-3 year terms only. For customers preferring longer commitments (many AU government and enterprise customers), Keepit's term options are more flexible.
Honestly, the case is narrow. The situations where it makes sense:
Outside those specific situations, partners should go direct to Keepit via CRS. The API, channel model, feature access, and AU support are structurally better.
One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.
Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 15+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.
AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 15+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.
Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.
Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.
Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.
Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.
Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.
Modern backup specialist vs legacy unified data protection suite. Where deployment flexibility and storage economics change the call.
15+ SaaS workloads. Independent cloud. More shipping every quarter.
Simple, Affordable Storage Optimisation and Disaster Recovery Protection
Top-Rated Backup, Ransomware Recovery, and Disaster Recovery