A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.
Okta backup as part of a 16-workload SaaS protection platform.
Dedicated Okta resilience with continuous backup and DR failover.
These products solve the same root problem (Okta has no native backup or rollback) but at different levels of depth. Keepit gives you Okta backup alongside 15 other SaaS workloads on independent immutable infrastructure. Acsense gives you deeper Okta-specific capabilities: continuous backup, dependency-aware recovery, and a hot standby tenant for DR failover. If Okta is your biggest identity risk and you want near-real-time protection with a live DR tenant, Acsense goes further. If you want Okta backup as part of a consolidated SaaS protection strategy, Keepit is the more practical choice.
Keepit backs up Okta users, groups, group rules, app assignments, admin roles, and policies to its own independent cloud. Blockchain-verified immutability. Part of the same platform that protects M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub, and 10 other workloads. Sydney data centre available.
Acsense is built exclusively for Okta protection. Continuous near-real-time backup (approximately 10-minute RPO), single-object restore, full tenant rollback, hot standby tenant with automated failover, and dependency-aware recovery that restores objects in the correct order. SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certified. Okta-recommended integration.
| Feature | KKeepit for Okta | ACAcsense |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure | Keepit-owned independent cloud. Sydney region. | Acsense-hosted. Region details not published. |
| Immutability | Blockchain-verified. | Not specified. |
| Backup frequency | Automated daily. | Continuous, near-real-time (~10-minute RPO). |
| Okta objects covered | Users, groups, group rules, app assignments, admin roles, policies. | Users, groups, applications, policies, workflows, authorisation servers, full object graph with dependencies. |
| Recovery: single object | Yes. Individual user, group, or policy restore. | Yes. Single-click recycle bin plus single-object restore. |
| Recovery: full tenant rollback | Point-in-time snapshot restore. | Full tenant rollback with dependency ordering (groups before users, policies before apps). |
| DR failover | Not available. Backup and recovery only. | Hot standby tenant with automated failover. |
| Multi-workload coverage | 16 SaaS workloads from one console. | Okta only. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC, ISAE 3402, GDPR, NIS2, HIPAA. | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001. |
| Pricing transparency | Per-user via CRS. All-inclusive storage. | Custom pricing. Sales call required. |
Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.
Okta operates under a shared responsibility model. It provides infrastructure redundancy but no point-in-time backup, no configuration rollback, and no restore capability for tenant data. If a user, group, or policy is accidentally deleted or misconfigured, Okta will not recover it for you.
Rebuilding an Okta tenant from scratch without a backup takes days. With a dedicated backup tool, recovery takes minutes. This is the core problem both Keepit and Acsense solve.
Acsense is purpose-built for Okta and goes deeper than any multi-workload backup vendor. Continuous backup means your RPO is approximately 10 minutes, not 24 hours. Dependency-aware recovery means Acsense restores groups before users, policies before application assignments, in the correct order, so you do not end up with a half-restored tenant that needs manual cleanup.
The hot standby tenant is genuine DR: if your primary Okta tenant goes down, Acsense can fail over to a live replica. No other Okta backup vendor offers this. For organisations where Okta is the single point of authentication for everything (VPN, SaaS, internal apps), this level of protection may be justified.
Most organisations do not need a live DR replica of their Okta tenant. They need a reliable daily backup with granular recovery so that accidental deletions and misconfigurations can be reversed. Keepit provides this, and it does so on independent, blockchain-verified immutable infrastructure.
The real advantage of Keepit for Okta is consolidation. If you are already using Keepit for M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, or GitHub, adding Okta is one more workload on the same platform. One vendor, one invoice, one admin interface, one set of compliance certifications. Managing Okta backup separately through Acsense means another vendor relationship, another contract, another set of credentials to manage.
CRS distributes Keepit across ANZ with Sydney data residency. We can assess whether daily Okta backup via Keepit meets your RPO requirements, or whether your Okta environment warrants the deeper protection Acsense provides.
See also: Keepit for Okta product page
CRS distributes Keepit with Sydney data residency and honest advice. We will assess your Okta environment and tell you whether Keepit's daily backup meets your needs, or whether you should consider Acsense for continuous protection. Contact us for a free consultation.
One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.
Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.
AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.
Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.
Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.
Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.
Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.
Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.
Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.
Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.
Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.
Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.
Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.
Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.
Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.