Cloud Ready Solutions
Comparison Guide

Keepit vs Acsense for Okta Backup (2026)

A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.

K
Option A
Keepit for Okta
Keepit

Okta backup as part of a 16-workload SaaS protection platform.

AC
Option B
Acsense
Acsense

Dedicated Okta resilience with continuous backup and DR failover.

Quick Summary

These products solve the same root problem (Okta has no native backup or rollback) but at different levels of depth. Keepit gives you Okta backup alongside 15 other SaaS workloads on independent immutable infrastructure. Acsense gives you deeper Okta-specific capabilities: continuous backup, dependency-aware recovery, and a hot standby tenant for DR failover. If Okta is your biggest identity risk and you want near-real-time protection with a live DR tenant, Acsense goes further. If you want Okta backup as part of a consolidated SaaS protection strategy, Keepit is the more practical choice.

K
Keepit

Keepit for Okta

Keepit backs up Okta users, groups, group rules, app assignments, admin roles, and policies to its own independent cloud. Blockchain-verified immutability. Part of the same platform that protects M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub, and 10 other workloads. Sydney data centre available.

AC
Acsense

Acsense

Acsense is built exclusively for Okta protection. Continuous near-real-time backup (approximately 10-minute RPO), single-object restore, full tenant rollback, hot standby tenant with automated failover, and dependency-aware recovery that restores objects in the correct order. SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certified. Okta-recommended integration.

Head-to-head comparison

Feature
KKeepit for Okta
ACAcsense
InfrastructureKeepit-owned independent cloud. Sydney region.Acsense-hosted. Region details not published.
ImmutabilityBlockchain-verified.Not specified.
Backup frequencyAutomated daily.Continuous, near-real-time (~10-minute RPO).
Okta objects coveredUsers, groups, group rules, app assignments, admin roles, policies.Users, groups, applications, policies, workflows, authorisation servers, full object graph with dependencies.
Recovery: single objectYes. Individual user, group, or policy restore.Yes. Single-click recycle bin plus single-object restore.
Recovery: full tenant rollbackPoint-in-time snapshot restore.Full tenant rollback with dependency ordering (groups before users, policies before apps).
DR failoverNot available. Backup and recovery only.Hot standby tenant with automated failover.
Multi-workload coverage16 SaaS workloads from one console.Okta only.
ComplianceISO 27001, SOC, ISAE 3402, GDPR, NIS2, HIPAA.SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001.
Pricing transparencyPer-user via CRS. All-inclusive storage.Custom pricing. Sales call required.

Highlighted cells show where one product has a clear advantage for the majority of Australian mid-market and MSP use cases. Ties are unhighlighted.

Okta has no native backup capability

Okta operates under a shared responsibility model. It provides infrastructure redundancy but no point-in-time backup, no configuration rollback, and no restore capability for tenant data. If a user, group, or policy is accidentally deleted or misconfigured, Okta will not recover it for you.

Rebuilding an Okta tenant from scratch without a backup takes days. With a dedicated backup tool, recovery takes minutes. This is the core problem both Keepit and Acsense solve.

When Acsense makes sense

Acsense is purpose-built for Okta and goes deeper than any multi-workload backup vendor. Continuous backup means your RPO is approximately 10 minutes, not 24 hours. Dependency-aware recovery means Acsense restores groups before users, policies before application assignments, in the correct order, so you do not end up with a half-restored tenant that needs manual cleanup.

The hot standby tenant is genuine DR: if your primary Okta tenant goes down, Acsense can fail over to a live replica. No other Okta backup vendor offers this. For organisations where Okta is the single point of authentication for everything (VPN, SaaS, internal apps), this level of protection may be justified.

When Keepit makes sense

Most organisations do not need a live DR replica of their Okta tenant. They need a reliable daily backup with granular recovery so that accidental deletions and misconfigurations can be reversed. Keepit provides this, and it does so on independent, blockchain-verified immutable infrastructure.

The real advantage of Keepit for Okta is consolidation. If you are already using Keepit for M365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, or GitHub, adding Okta is one more workload on the same platform. One vendor, one invoice, one admin interface, one set of compliance certifications. Managing Okta backup separately through Acsense means another vendor relationship, another contract, another set of credentials to manage.

CRS and Keepit for Okta

CRS distributes Keepit across ANZ with Sydney data residency. We can assess whether daily Okta backup via Keepit meets your RPO requirements, or whether your Okta environment warrants the deeper protection Acsense provides.

See also: Keepit for Okta product page

Frequently asked questions

No. Okta provides infrastructure redundancy but no customer-facing backup, point-in-time recovery, or configuration rollback. If you accidentally delete a group or misconfigure a policy, Okta will not restore it.

Evaluating Okta backup for your organisation?

CRS distributes Keepit with Sydney data residency and honest advice. We will assess your Okta environment and tell you whether Keepit's daily backup meets your needs, or whether you should consider Acsense for continuous protection. Contact us for a free consultation.

Related comparisons

K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
V

Keepit vs Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.

Read comparison
K
vs
AP

Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup for Australian Organisations (2026)

AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.

Read comparison
K
vs
D

Keepit vs Datto SaaS Protection for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.

Read comparison
K
vs
AC

Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud for M365 Backup (2026)

Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.

Read comparison
K
vs
DR

Keepit vs Druva for Microsoft 365 Backup (2026)

Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.

Read comparison
K
vs
MS

Keepit vs Microsoft 365 Native Backup: Do You Need Third-Party? (2026)

Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.

Read comparison
K
vs
SK

Keepit vs SkyKick Cloud Backup for MSPs (2026)

Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
AS

Keepit vs Arcserve SaaS Backup: The OEM Relationship You Should Know About (2026)

Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.

Read comparison
K
vs
BC

Keepit vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup: M365 Backup Compared (2026)

Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Jira Cloud Backup (2026)

Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.

Read comparison
K
vs
R

Keepit vs Rewind for Confluence Cloud Backup (2026)

Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for GitHub Backup (2026)

Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.

Read comparison
K
vs
GP

Keepit vs GitProtect for Azure DevOps Backup (2026)

Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.

Read comparison
K
vs
ZD

Keepit vs Zendesk Native Backup: Why Zendesk Exports Are Not Enough (2026)

Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.

Read comparison