Honest, side-by-side comparisons written by the CRS team. We distribute one side of each comparison and we are upfront about that — but we also tell you when the other product is the better fit.
Licensing, cost, features, and a realistic migration path for Australian organisations leaving VMware after the Broadcom acquisition.
Both run VMs. Both replace VMware. One costs 2-4x more than the other. Here is what you actually get for the difference.
Microsoft has deprecated standalone Hyper-V Server and is pushing Azure Stack HCI. Where Proxmox picks up the slack.
Licensing, multi-tenancy, pricing, and deployment decisions for MSPs building a backup-as-a-service practice in Australia.
Pure VM backup specialist vs a backup+security+endpoint bundle. When the integration helps, when it hurts.
Independent VM backup specialist vs the email-security company that acquired Altaro. Roadmap, features, and MSP fit.
Both back up Proxmox. One is owned by Kaseya. Where that matters for the next five years of your practice.
Modern backup specialist vs legacy unified data protection suite. Where deployment flexibility and storage economics change the call.
Licensing, coverage, and cost for Australian businesses choosing a backup platform for internal IT, not an MSP practice.
One is SaaS with vendor-independent infrastructure. The other is self-managed software you run yourself. Real pricing, real trade-offs.
Both are fully managed SaaS. One runs on Azure, the other does not. One covers 16+ SaaS apps, the other covers 4. Real pricing and honest trade-offs.
AvePoint has IRAP. Keepit has 16+ workloads. Both cover M365 and Google Workspace. The comparison is closer than most people expect.
Broader SaaS coverage with vendor independence, or the Kaseya ecosystem with deeper PSA integration? An MSP-focused comparison.
Pure SaaS backup with vendor-independent immutability, or an integrated backup-and-security bundle? What matters more for your M365 protection.
Two SaaS-native backup platforms with immutable storage. One owns its infrastructure. The other runs on AWS. That difference matters more than you think.
Microsoft now offers native backup for M365. It has a 1-year retention limit, no immutability, and lives on the same infrastructure as your production data. Here is why that matters.
Broader SaaS coverage with independent immutability, or white-label simplicity with 6x daily backups? An MSP comparison for M365 backup.
Arcserve SaaS Backup is a Keepit OEM. Here's why the rebranded version loses on API, workloads, channel, and AU support.
Hourly backups and bundled security, or 16+ SaaS workloads with structural immutability? A practical comparison for MSPs and IT teams protecting Microsoft 365.
Two SaaS backup platforms that cover Jira Cloud, but with fundamentally different infrastructure models and pricing approaches.
Comparing two approaches to protecting your Confluence knowledge base: independent immutable cloud versus Marketplace-native backup.
Two backup platforms that protect GitHub repositories and metadata, with different infrastructure models, coverage depth, and pricing.
Two platforms that back up Azure DevOps, the workload Microsoft explicitly says it will not recover for you.
A multi-workload SaaS backup platform versus a dedicated Okta resilience specialist. Different tools for different problems.
Zendesk provides data exports and a 30-day recycle bin. Here is why that is not a backup strategy, and what Keepit adds.
Veeam-native air-gapped appliance vs the Kaseya-owned BCDR incumbent. Where each fits in an Australian MSP stack.
Two integrated BCDR appliances, two ownership models. Where Veeam-on-StoneFly lands against the Kaseya-owned incumbent.
Air-gapped independence vs cloud-first convenience. Two different philosophies on where backup data should live.
Unified storage platform vs dedicated object storage. When each architecture wins for private S3.
When NetApp's object storage specialist makes sense vs a unified storage platform that also does S3.
Enterprise-grade HCI at a fraction of Nutanix pricing. When each wins for 3-5 node mid-market clusters.
Two HCI appliances, both distributed by CRS. How to decide which fits your customer.
VCF has made vSAN unaffordable for mid-market. Where StarWind VSAN picks up the slack.
2-node HA and ProActive support vs the HCI category leader. Where each wins below the enterprise tier.
Cloud-enable the file server you already have, or migrate to SharePoint. Which path fits your customer.
Self-hosted MSP-multi-tenant vs SaaS governance platform. Where each wins for hybrid file access.
Synology is great until it isn't. When dual controllers, SAS, and enterprise IOPS become requirements.
Two Taiwanese storage vendors, one with a clean security record. Why the difference matters for production workloads.
Higher throughput, third-party drives, no per-feature licensing. Why we're winning this comparison in AU mid-market.
Same drive lock-in story, different tier-one vendor. Why partners are walking away from the HPE premium.
Enterprise all-NVMe flash at mid-market pricing. Where Dell-qualified drives meet the XF5 alternative.
Pure Storage is the all-flash benchmark. QSAN XF5 is where partners go when the Pure premium is unaffordable.
Two APAC mid-market unified storage vendors. Host port density vs scale-out architecture.
Dell's unified storage platform is being transitioned to PowerStore. Where that leaves Unity XT buyers.
Turnkey container appliance vs enterprise HCI Kubernetes. Two shapes for running on-prem containers in 2026.
The natural Synology RS graduation point: dual-active NVMe unified storage at SMB price points.
Two enterprise NAS options at SMB-friendly pricing. Dual-active versus app ecosystem.
Flagship NVMe block storage compared on latency, software ecosystem, and Australian five-year TCO.
On-prem Kubernetes without VMware licensing. Two answers — converged appliance versus Tanzu on vSphere.
Single-appliance Kubernetes versus enterprise HCI Kubernetes. Picking the right shape for the workload.
Cloud-enable the file server you already have, or migrate everything to OneDrive. What IT actually loses in the switch.
Google Drive looks like a file server replacement on the surface. What breaks when you actually try it.
Cloud sync that users love and IT distrusts, vs cloud access that preserves IT control.
Two MSP-focused security platforms with very different shapes. Unified versus modular, identity-native versus endpoint-led.
Both pitch "unified SMB security." One is MSP-first and built for channel delivery, the other is direct-to-SMB and modular.
Two managed detection and response stories aimed at very different segments. SMB-priced unified platform versus enterprise-heritage MTR.
Bundled AV versus real managed detection and response across identity, endpoint and email.
Both CRS vendors. They cover different jobs on the same endpoint and pair cleanly rather than compete.
Two best-in-class platforms on one CRS deal versus one all-in-one Acronis agent. Honest take on the trade-off.
Two purpose-built platforms on one CRS deal versus a legacy email security vendor that has grown into backup and XDR. Honest comparison.